Reading comprehension is the ability to understand, interpret, and analyze texts. It is a fundamental skill that underpins successful learning and academic achievement. The National Reading Panel (NRP) identified reading comprehension as one of the five critical components of effective reading instruction, emphasizing its central role in literacy. This blog post explores what reading comprehension is, why it is important, and how current research continues to highlight its essential role in literacy and overall academic success.

What is Reading Comprehension?

Reading comprehension involves multiple processes that enable readers to make sense of written text. These processes include:

• Decoding: The ability to recognize and process written words.
• Vocabulary Knowledge: Understanding the meanings of words and how they are used in context.
• Fluency: The ability to read text accurately and smoothly, which allows for better focus on understanding the text.
• Background Knowledge: Prior knowledge and experiences that readers bring to a text, which help them make connections and infer meaning.
• Comprehension Strategies: Techniques that readers use to make sense of text, such as summarizing, questioning, predicting, and visualizing.

Effective reading comprehension is not just about reading the words on a page but involves an active engagement with the text, leading to a deeper understanding and the ability to apply the information.

The Importance of Reading Comprehension

The National Reading Panel's report highlighted several reasons why reading comprehension is crucial:

• Foundation for Academic Success: Reading comprehension is essential for academic success across all subjects. Students who can understand and interpret text are better equipped to learn new information, follow instructions, and engage in critical thinking. This skill is foundational for subjects such as science, social studies, and mathematics.
• Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: Reading comprehension fosters critical thinking and problem-solving skills. By understanding and analyzing texts, students learn to evaluate information, make inferences, and draw conclusions. These skills are vital for academic achievement and real-world problem-solving.
• Lifelong Learning: Reading comprehension is a gateway to lifelong learning. Individuals who can comprehend texts effectively are more likely to continue learning throughout their lives. This ability opens up opportunities for personal growth, career advancement, and informed citizenship.
• Enhanced Communication Skills: Effective reading comprehension contributes to better communication skills. Understanding complex texts and diverse perspectives helps individuals articulate their thoughts and ideas clearly and persuasively, both in writing and speaking.
• Cognitive Development: Reading comprehension supports cognitive development by engaging the brain in complex processes of understanding, analyzing, and synthesizing information. This engagement enhances cognitive functions such as memory, attention, and executive functioning.

Current Research on Reading Comprehension

Since the publication of the NRP Report, further research has continued to support the importance of reading comprehension. Key findings from recent studies include:

• Importance of Background Knowledge: Research emphasizes the role of background knowledge in reading comprehension. Readers with relevant prior knowledge about a topic are better able to understand and retain new information. This finding underscores the importance of integrating content knowledge with reading instruction.
• Role of Vocabulary: Vocabulary knowledge is a critical component of reading comprehension. Studies show that a rich vocabulary enhances readers' ability to understand and interpret text. Effective vocabulary instruction, therefore, is essential for improving reading comprehension.
• Use of Comprehension Strategies: Teaching comprehension strategies explicitly is highly effective. Strategies such as summarizing, questioning, predicting, and visualizing help readers actively engage with the text and improve their understanding.
• Impact of Motivation and Engagement: Motivation and engagement play significant roles in reading comprehension. Students who are motivated and engaged in reading are more likely to invest the effort required to understand complex texts. Creating a motivating and engaging reading environment is crucial for fostering comprehension.
• Technology Integration: Technology can support reading comprehension by providing interactive and engaging reading experiences. Digital tools, such as e-books and reading apps, offer features like annotations, multimedia elements, and interactive questions that enhance comprehension.

Practical Strategies for Developing Reading Comprehension

To maximize the effectiveness of reading comprehension instruction, educators should incorporate evidence-based strategies into their teaching practices. Here are some practical tips:

• Activate Prior Knowledge: Help students activate their prior knowledge before reading. Discuss what they already know about the topic and how it relates to the new text. This strategy helps students make connections and set a purpose for reading.
• Teach Vocabulary Explicitly: Provide explicit vocabulary instruction to enhance students' understanding of keywords and phrases in the text. Use various methods, such as word maps, context clues, and direct teaching, to build vocabulary knowledge.
• Use Comprehension Strategies: Teach students specific comprehension strategies, such as summarizing, questioning, predicting, and visualizing. Model these strategies during read-alouds and guided reading sessions, and provide opportunities for students to practice them independently.
• Encourage Active Reading: Encourage students to engage in active reading by annotating the text, asking questions, and making predictions. Use graphic organizers and note-taking strategies to help students organize their thoughts and track their understanding.
• Foster a Love of Reading: Create a motivating and engaging reading environment. Provide a diverse selection of reading materials that cater to students' interests and reading levels. Encourage independent reading and provide time for students to share and discuss what they have read.
• Integrate Technology: Incorporate technology to enhance reading comprehension. Use digital tools and resources, such as e-books, interactive reading apps, and online discussion forums, to provide engaging and interactive reading experiences.
• Differentiated Instruction: Differentiate reading comprehension instruction to meet the diverse needs of learners. Provide additional support for struggling readers and challenge advanced readers with more complex texts and higher-order thinking tasks.
• Monitor Progress: Regularly assess students' reading comprehension skills using various assessment tools, such as quizzes, written responses, and comprehension questions. Use the assessment data to inform instruction and provide targeted support.

Case Study: Effective Reading Comprehension Instruction in Action

To illustrate the practical application of these strategies, let’s look at a case study from a fifth-grade classroom.

Classroom Context:

Mr. Anderson is a fifth-grade teacher who prioritizes reading comprehension in his literacy instruction. He uses a combination of explicit strategy instruction, vocabulary building, and engaging activities to enhance his students' comprehension skills.

Implementation:

• Activate Prior Knowledge: Before reading a new text, Mr. Anderson engages students in a discussion about what they already know about the topic. He encourages them to share their experiences and make connections to the text.
• Teach Vocabulary Explicitly: Mr. Anderson introduces key vocabulary words before reading. He uses word maps and context clues to help students understand the meanings and uses of these words. He also encourages students to use the new vocabulary in their writing and discussions.
• Use Comprehension Strategies: Mr. Anderson teaches specific comprehension strategies, such as summarizing, questioning, predicting, and visualizing. He models these strategies during read-alouds and guided reading sessions, and provides opportunities for students to practice them independently.
• Encourage Active Reading: Mr. Anderson encourages students to engage in active reading by annotating the text, asking questions, and making predictions. He uses graphic organizers and note-taking strategies to help students organize their thoughts and track their understanding.
• Foster a Love of Reading: Mr. Anderson creates a motivating and engaging reading environment. He provides a diverse selection of reading materials that cater to students' interests and reading levels. He encourages independent reading and provides time for students to share and discuss what they have read.
• Integrate Technology: Mr. Anderson integrates technology by using digital tools and resources, such as e-books, interactive reading apps, and online discussion forums. These tools provide engaging and interactive reading experiences for students.
• Differentiated Instruction: Mr. Anderson differentiates reading comprehension instruction to meet the diverse needs of his students. He provides additional support for struggling readers and challenges advanced readers with more complex texts and higher-order thinking tasks.
• Monitor Progress: Mr. Anderson regularly assesses his students' reading comprehension skills using various assessment tools, such as quizzes, written responses, and comprehension questions. He uses the assessment data to inform his instruction and provide targeted support.

Outcomes:

By the end of the school year, Mr. Anderson’s students demonstrate significant improvement in their reading comprehension skills. They are better able to understand, interpret, and analyze texts. This improvement in comprehension translates into better overall academic performance and increased confidence in their reading abilities. Mr. Anderson’s systematic and engaging approach to reading comprehension instruction has helped his students become more proficient and motivated readers.

Reading comprehension is a vital component of literacy development, as highlighted by the National Reading Panel and supported by ongoing research. It provides the necessary foundation for academic success, critical thinking, lifelong learning, and effective communication. Effective comprehension instruction, delivered through explicit, systematic, and engaging methods, can significantly improve students' reading outcomes.

Teachers play a crucial role in fostering reading comprehension. By incorporating evidence-based strategies and providing ample practice opportunities, they can help ensure that all students develop the comprehension skills necessary for reading success. As research continues to evolve, the importance of reading comprehension remains clear, underscoring its role as a cornerstone of literacy education.

References

• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. U.S. Government Printing Office.
• Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction (pp. 205-242). International Reading Association.
• Pressley, M. (2006). Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
• Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. RAND Corporation.
• Shanahan, T., Callison, K., Carriere, C., Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Schatschneider, C., & Torgesen, J. (2010). Improving Reading Comprehension in Kindergarten Through 3rd Grade: A Practice Guide (NCEE 2010-4038). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
• McKeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (2006). Encouraging young children’s language interactions with stories. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of Early Literacy Research (Vol. 2, pp. 281-294). Guilford Press.

This is the bottom of the pyramid because it means ALL means ALL. All the students in your class are receiving a guaranteed and viable curriculum that is being provided explicitly and following a scope and sequence.

Students are general education students first. 

If you have more than 50% of your students needing interventions. You have a core instruction or Tier 1 problem. NOT AN INTERVENTION PROBLEM.

In the landscape of what our classrooms look like it's getting harder to ensure that all students receive high-quality instruction is a primary goal. At the heart of this mission lies Tier 1 instruction, also known as core instruction. This foundational level of teaching is critical for meeting the diverse needs of students in the classroom and ensuring that all students, regardless of their background or abilities, have access to a rigorous and engaging education.

What is Tier 1 Instruction?

Tier 1 instruction is the baseline level of teaching that all students receive in a general education classroom. It is designed to be effective for the majority of students, providing a strong foundation in key academic areas. The primary aim of Tier 1 instruction is to deliver high-quality, evidence-based teaching practices that promote student learning and achievement.

What are Diagnostic Assessments?

Diagnostic assessments in education are tools used to identify students' strengths, weaknesses, knowledge, and skills prior to instruction. They help educators understand students' learning needs and tailor instruction accordingly. Here are some key features and purposes of diagnostic assessments:

Identification of Learning Gaps: They identify specific areas where students are struggling or excelling, allowing for targeted interventions.

Personalized Instruction: The results can inform differentiated instruction strategies to meet the diverse needs of students.

Baseline Data: They provide baseline data to measure student growth over time.

Early Intervention: Early identification of learning difficulties enables timely support and intervention, preventing minor issues from becoming major obstacles.

Informed Instructional Planning: Teachers can use the data to plan lessons that address the specific needs of their students, enhancing the effectiveness of instruction.

Examples of diagnostic assessments include:

Pre-tests: Assessments given before a unit or course to gauge prior knowledge.

Screening Tests: Brief assessments to identify students at risk of academic difficulties.

Reading Inventories: Tools that assess reading skills, such as phonemic awareness, fluency, and comprehension.

Math Diagnostics: Assessments that evaluate specific math skills and concepts.

Diagnostic assessments are an essential component of the Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS), particularly in Tier 2, where they help identify students who need additional support and inform the development of targeted interventions.

Examples of Diagnostic Assessments are iReady and STARR.

What Universal Assessments?

Universal assessments in education are standardized tests administered to all students within a specific grade level, school, or district to evaluate their academic performance and identify areas needing improvement. These assessments are designed to provide a broad overview of students' skills and knowledge, ensuring that educators can make informed decisions about curriculum and instruction. 

Here are some key aspects of universal assessments:

Screening: They serve as a screening tool to identify students who may need further diagnostic assessment or intervention.

Benchmarking: Universal assessments help establish performance benchmarks and track student progress over time.

Equity: They ensure that all students are assessed using the same criteria, promoting fairness and equity in education.

Accountability: Results from these assessments are often used for accountability purposes, informing policy decisions, and evaluating educational programs.

Data-Driven Decision Making: The data gathered helps educators and administrators make informed decisions about resource allocation, instructional strategies, and professional development needs.

Examples of universal assessments include:

State Standardized Tests: These are mandated by state education departments and cover subjects such as math, reading, and science.

National Assessments: Examples include the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in the United States.

Universal Screening Tools: Brief assessments administered to all students at the beginning of the school year to identify those at risk of academic difficulties. Examples include Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) and Measures of Academic Progress (MAP).

Formative Assessments: Tools like quizzes or interim assessments that provide ongoing feedback to teachers and students.

Universal assessments are a critical component of the Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS), particularly in Tier 1, where they help ensure that all students receive high-quality, standards-aligned instruction and that those who need additional support are identified early.

The Importance of Tier 1 Instruction

Inclusivity and Equity: Tier 1 instruction ensures that every student has access to quality education. By implementing effective teaching strategies at this level, educators can address the diverse needs of their students, reducing the achievement gap and promoting equity in education.

Preventative Approach: High-quality Tier 1 instruction serves as a preventative measure, reducing the need for more intensive interventions. When core instruction is strong, fewer students will require additional support, which can be time-consuming and costly.

Efficiency in Resource Allocation: By focusing on improving Tier 1 instruction, schools can allocate their resources more efficiently. Effective core instruction reduces the strain on special education services and intervention programs, allowing those resources to be directed to students who need them the most.

Foundation for Lifelong Learning: Strong Tier 1 instruction lays the groundwork for lifelong learning. It equips students with essential skills and knowledge, fostering a love for learning and encouraging them to pursue further education and personal development.

Strategies in Implementing Science of Reading Best Practices in Core Instruction

To ensure that Tier 1 instruction aligns with the science of reading, teachers must integrate evidence or research based practices into their teaching. Here are some strategies to consider:

• Explicit Instruction: Explicit teaching involves clear, direct instruction on specific skills and concepts. This approach is particularly effective for teaching phonemic awareness and phonics. For example, teachers can use systematic phonics programs that guide students through a sequence of letter-sound relationships, starting with the simplest and gradually increasing in complexity.
• Systematic and Sequential Instruction: Reading instruction should follow a logical sequence, building on previously taught skills. This approach helps students develop a solid foundation and ensures that they master basic skills before moving on to more complex ones.
• Differentiated Instruction: While Tier 1 instruction is designed to meet the needs of most students, it is important to recognize that students have varying abilities and learning styles. Differentiated instruction involves tailoring teaching methods and materials to accommodate these differences. For example, teachers can use small group instruction to provide additional support to students who are struggling with specific skills.
• Integrated Literacy Activities: Reading instruction should be integrated with other areas of the curriculum, such as writing, speaking, and listening. This holistic approach reinforces literacy skills and helps students see the relevance of reading in different contexts.
• Ongoing Assessment and Feedback: Regular assessment and feedback are essential for monitoring student progress and adjusting instruction as needed. Formative assessments, such as running records and informal reading inventories, provide valuable insights into students’ reading abilities and help teachers identify areas where additional support is needed.

Strategies for Implementing Math Best Practices in Core Instruction

Implementing best practices in math instruction is essential for fostering a deep understanding of mathematical concepts among students. Effective math instruction not only helps students succeed academically but also equips them with critical thinking and problem-solving skills necessary for real-world applications. Here are several strategies classroom teachers can use to implement math best practices in their core instruction.

1. Focus on Conceptual Understanding: One of the most crucial aspects of effective math instruction is helping students develop a deep conceptual understanding of mathematical concepts. Instead of merely teaching procedures and algorithms, focus on the underlying principles. Use visual aids, manipulatives, and real-life examples to illustrate abstract concepts. Encourage students to explain their reasoning and explore different ways to solve problems. By building a strong foundation of conceptual knowledge, students are better equipped to tackle complex problems and apply their learning in various contexts.

2. Incorporate Problem-Solving and Critical Thinking: Mathematics is not just about finding the right answers; it's about understanding the process and thinking critically about problems. Incorporate problem-solving activities that challenge students to think creatively and reason logically. Present open-ended problems that have multiple solutions or approaches. Encourage students to discuss their problem-solving strategies with peers and justify their reasoning. This practice not only enhances their critical thinking skills but also promotes a growth mindset, where students view challenges as opportunities to learn and improve.

3. Use Formative Assessments: Formative assessments are essential tools for gauging student understanding and guiding instruction. Regularly use formative assessments such as quizzes, exit tickets, and informal observations to check for understanding. Analyze the results to identify areas where students are struggling and adjust your instruction accordingly. Formative assessments provide immediate feedback to both teachers and students, allowing for timely interventions and support.

4. Differentiate Instruction: In any classroom, students have diverse learning needs and paces. Differentiating instruction ensures that all students have access to the curriculum and can succeed. Use flexible grouping to provide targeted instruction based on students' needs. Offer varied tasks and activities that cater to different learning styles and levels of readiness. Incorporate technology and online resources to provide personalized learning experiences. Differentiation allows you to meet students where they are and help them progress effectively.

5. Promote Mathematical Discourse: Encouraging mathematical discourse in the classroom helps students articulate their thinking and deepen their understanding. Create a classroom environment where students feel comfortable sharing their ideas, asking questions, and engaging in discussions. Use open-ended questions and prompts to stimulate conversation. Encourage students to explain their reasoning, critique the reasoning of others, and build on each other's ideas. Mathematical discourse not only enhances understanding but also fosters a collaborative learning community.

6. Integrate Technology: Technology can be a powerful tool in math instruction when used effectively. Use digital tools and resources to enhance learning and engagement. Interactive math software, virtual manipulatives, and online games can provide dynamic and interactive experiences that make learning math fun and engaging. Additionally, technology can facilitate differentiated instruction by providing personalized learning paths and instant feedback.

7. Connect Math to Real-Life Contexts: Making math relevant to students' lives helps them see the value and application of what they are learning. Incorporate real-life contexts and problems into your lessons. Use examples from everyday life, such as shopping, cooking, or sports, to illustrate mathematical concepts. Engage students in projects that require them to apply their math skills to solve real-world problems. Connecting math to real-life situations makes learning more meaningful and motivates students to engage with the content.

8. Provide Ongoing Professional Development:  Continual professional development is essential for staying current with best practices in math instruction. Participate in workshops, conferences, and professional learning communities to enhance your teaching skills and knowledge. Collaborate with colleagues to share strategies and resources. Reflect on your practice and seek feedback to improve your instruction. Ongoing professional development ensures that you are equipped with the latest research and techniques to provide high-quality math instruction.

Challenges and Considerations

Implementing high-quality Tier 1 instruction is not without its challenges. Here are a few considerations for educators:

1. Professional Development: Ensuring that teachers have the knowledge and skills to implement evidence-based reading practices requires ongoing professional development. Schools must invest in training programs that equip teachers with the latest research and instructional strategies.

2. Curriculum Alignment: The curriculum must align with the principles of the science of reading. Schools should evaluate their reading programs and materials to ensure they support systematic and explicit instruction.

3. Time and Resources: Effective reading instruction requires adequate time and resources. Schools must prioritize literacy instruction and allocate sufficient time for teachers to plan, teach, and assess student learning.

4. Student Engagement: Keeping students engaged and motivated is crucial for successful reading instruction. Teachers should use a variety of instructional strategies and materials to maintain student interest and encourage a love for reading.

Tier 1 instruction forms the bedrock of an equitable and effective grade level instruction, ensuring that all students receive a guaranteed and viable curriculum delivered through explicit teaching and a well-defined scope and sequence. Recognizing that general education students are the priority, a high percentage of students needing intervention signals a need to strengthen core instruction rather than solely focusing on interventions. Diagnostic and universal assessments play crucial roles in informing and monitoring the effectiveness of this foundational tier. Ultimately, prioritizing robust Tier 1 instruction fosters inclusivity, prevents the overuse of intervention resources, and builds a strong academic foundation for all learners.

Do you happen to know how many standards students have to master to be able to solve basic multiplication and division equations?

I went looking and it’s more than 15!

I’m talking about place value, counting, and solving addition and subtraction facts fluently.

These skills are the foundations and need to be taught to mastery!

Do you need help getting your students to master place value or counting skills or addition and subtraction fluency?

If so, you're in luck! In this blog post, we will discuss how to teach these skills and ways to teach these concepts. 

The first way is drill and kill practice. This is a traditional approach that many teachers use. The second way is with place-value games. Games are a great way to engage students and help them learn in a fun way. Finally, the third way is to give students time to demonstrate mastery in a variety of different ways. 

Why Worry about it??

First–if you don't, who will!! Passing the buck doesn’t help anyone and when they get to 3rd grade your students will drown and the teacher who has them will give up.

Thank you for being part of my soap box.

Mastering multiplication and division requires a strong foundation in several basic mathematical skills, notably place value, counting, and addition & subtraction. Each of these skills plays a crucial role in understanding and performing multiplication and division effectively.

Place Value

Place value is fundamental in mathematics as it helps in understanding the significance of digits in a number based on their position. 

The Framework

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) requires that special education evaluations be sufficiently comprehensive to make eligibility decisions and identify the student’s educational needs, whether or not commonly linked to the disability category in which the student has been classified (34 CFR 300.304). Comprehensive evaluations are conducted in a culturally and linguistically responsive manner; non-discriminatory for students of all cultural, racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and other backgrounds. When conducting special education evaluations, IEP teams must follow all procedural and substantive evaluation requirements specified in IDEA. 

The BIG Ideas

• Special education evaluations must be sufficiently comprehensive for IEP teams to determine special education eligibility or continuing eligibility and to identify the educational needs of the student, whether or not commonly linked to the student’s identified disability category(ies).
• A comprehensive evaluation is a process, not an event. IEP team participants work together to explore, problem-solve, and make decisions about eligibility for special education services. If found eligible, the IEP team uses information gathered during the evaluation to collectively develop the content of the student’s IEP.
• A comprehensive special education evaluation actively engages the family throughout the evaluation process.
• Comprehensive evaluations are first and foremost “needs focused” on identifying academic and functional skill areas affected by the student’s disability, rather than “label focused” on identifying a disability category label which may or may not, accurately infer student need.
• Developmentally and educationally relevant questions about instruction, curriculum, environment, as well as the student, guide the evaluation. Such questions are especially helpful during the review of existing data to determine what if any, additional information is needed. 
• Asking clarifying questions throughout the evaluation helps the team explore educational concerns as well as student strengths and needs such as barriers to and conditions that support student learning, and important skills the student needs to develop or improve.
• Culturally responsive problem-solving and data-based decision-making using current, valid, and reliable (i.e. accurate) assessment data and information is critical to conducting a comprehensive evaluation.
• Assessment tools and strategies used to collect additional information must be linguistically and culturally sensitive and must provide accurate and useful data about the student’s academic, developmental, and functional skills.
• Data and other information used during the evaluation process is collected through multiple means including review, interview, observation, and testing; as well as across domains of learning including instruction, curriculum, environment, and learner.
• Individuals who collect and interpret assessment data and other information during an evaluation must be appropriately skilled in test administration and other data collection methods. This includes understanding how systemic, racial, and other types of bias may influence data collection and interpretation, and how individual student characteristics may influence results.
• Assessment data and other information gathered over time and across environments help the team understand and make evaluation decisions about the nature and effects of a student’s disability on their education.
• Comprehensive evaluations must provide information relevant to making decisions about how to educate the student. A comprehensive evaluation provides the foundation for developing an IEP that promotes student access, engagement, and progress in age or grade-level general education curriculum, instruction, and other activities, and environments.

The Balcony View

Comprehensive evaluations must provide information relevant to making decisions about how to educate the student so they can access, engage, and make meaningful progress toward meeting age and grade level standards. Assessment and collection of additional information play a central role during the evaluation and subsequently in IEP development and reviewing student progress. 

A comprehensive evaluation takes into account Career Readiness, a growing awareness of the relationship between evaluation and IEP development, and the need for information about how special education evaluations and reevaluations can be made more useful for IEP development.

The 2017 US Supreme Court Endrew F. case also brought renewed attention to the importance of knowing whether a student's IEP is sufficient to enable a student with a disability to make progress “appropriate in light of their circumstances.” Finally, updated guidance, including results of statewide procedural compliance self-assessment, IDEA complaints addressing whether evaluations are sufficiently comprehensive, and continuing disproportionate disability identification, placement, and discipline in student groups who traditionally are not equitably served.

A comprehensive evaluation responds to stakeholders’ requests for more information and reinforces that every public school student graduates ready for further education, the workplace, and the community.

It seeks to ensure a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) for every student protected under IDEA. It guides IEP teams in planning and conducting special education evaluations that explicitly address state and federal requirements to conduct comprehensive evaluations that help IEP teams to determine eligibility, and thoroughly and clearly identify student needs. 

Planning and Conducting a Comprehensive Special Education Evaluation

An Individualized Education Program (IEP) is the key to addressing a student’s disability-related needs.
It describes annual goals and the supports and services a student must receive so they can access, engage, and make progress in general education. 

A well-developed IEP is a vehicle to ensure that a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) is provided to students protected under IDEA. A comprehensive special education evaluation provides the foundation for effective IEP development. 

A comprehensive special education evaluation is conducted by a student’s IEP team appointed by the district. The IEP team must include the parent as a required participant and essential partner in decision-making. Special Education evaluation is a collaborative IEP team responsibility. During the evaluation process, the team collectively gathers relevant information and uses it to make accurate and individualized decisions about a student’s eligibility or continuing eligibility, effects of disability, areas of strength, and academic and functional needs.

Data and other information used to make evaluation decisions come from a variety of sources and environments, often extending beyond the IEP team. Guided by educationally relevant questions, both existing and new information is compiled or collected, analyzed, integrated, and summarized by the IEP team to provide a comprehensive picture of the student’s educational strengths and needs.

A comprehensive special education evaluation is grounded in a culturally responsive problem-solving model in which potential systemic, racial, and other bias is addressed, and hypotheses about the nature and extent of the student’s disability are generated and explored.

Conducting a comprehensive special education evaluation requires planning. Each team has its own methods for planning and conducting comprehensive special education evaluations with guidance from the state and district.

Why RIOT/ICEL Matrix?

Balanced literacy. Orton-Gilliamham. Think-Alouds. Graphic Organizers. Direct instruction. OMG!!! 

Have you ever sat staring at your plans and IEPs and wonder how the #@& am I going to move this kid? Simply because of where the student sits in relation to their grade-level peers. 

I have. 

OR 

I have so many with the same need but they didn’t make as much progress as I was hoping. (Or they needed to.)

Buildings don’t buy curriculum programs with special education students in mind. They might ask (if you're lucky) for your input. To be real, they buy with the larger in mind, which makes sense when you need to get the biggest bang for your buck. 

What to do?????

In my building, moving students more than a year's growth is VERY important to us. We strive to close those gaps before they move to middle school. 

I don’t have programs. Well, I have access to several but they can be (and most of the time) used by classroom teachers or worse the materials from the program were used but not the program itself. 

I know I’m not the only one. So, what do you do???  

OR 

Want to learn what I do to get data that looks like this? 

 

                                               

I had an Instructional Coach when I first started teaching, that showed me the value of putting time into learning and mastering both educational best practices and evidence-based practices. So even, if I was stuck with limited options, I could get tons of bang without a whole lot of stress. 

Take guided reading, (yes, I know but you have to work with what you got), I became an expert at guided reading. I worked in tiny groups of two and three but with best practices and a couple of evidence-based practices, I was able to move kids to within months of their peers. (This brings up a whole different conversation when you can do this--is core really happening in the classroom or are they special education. I’m not going to answer those questions, as those are part of the larger school system.)

The Elementary Secondary Education Act defines evidence-based practices as those “effective educational strategies supported by evidence and research”.  When teachers use evidence-based practices with fidelity, they can be confident their teaching is likely to support student learning. 

and

David Ardale defines best education practices as the wide range of individual activities, policies, and program approaches to achieving positive changes in student attitudes or academic behaviors. 

Think Hattie and Marzano. (We all have a love/hate relationship with them)

Join me as I walk through how I use these ideas to get the most bang for your buck and move kids to close gaps with my special education students. 

Send me your questions or if you're stuck and need help with. I’ll help you problem solve.

Chat soon,

What is MTSS?

A Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) is a framework of team-driven data-based problem solving for improving the outcomes of every student through family, school, and community partnering and a layered continuum of evidence-based practices applied at the classroom, school, district, region, and state level. MTSS is a coherent continuum of evidence-based, system-wide practices to support a rapid response to academic and behavioral needs, with frequent data-based monitoring for instructional decision-making to empower each student to achieve high standards.MTSS models rely on data to assess student needs and help teachers understand which kinds of intervention they need within each tier.

What is Response to Intervention?

Response to Intervention, or RTI, is an educational approach designed to help all learners to succeed, through a combination of high-quality instruction, early identification of struggling students, and responsive, targeted evidence-based interventions to address specific learning needs. RTI uses ongoing progress monitoring and data collection to facilitate data-based decision-making. In addition, the implementation of RTI will assist in the correct identification of learning or other disorders.

In my building, MTSS is the umbrella and RTI falls under it. All students are active participants in MTSS but not all students will be active participants in RTI. 

How does RTI work?

It operates on a 3-tiered framework of interventions at increasing levels of intensity. The process begins with high-quality core instruction in the general education classroom. Teachers use a variety of instructional methods to maximize student engagement and learning: modeling of skills, small group instruction, guided practice, independent practice, to name a few.

Through universal screening methods, struggling learners are identified and are given more intense instruction and interventions that are more targeted to individual needs. By giving frequent assessments and analyzing data, teachers make decisions about what levels of intervention will best support student achievement.

What are the Tiers?

Tier I: This is the guaranteed and viable curriculum that all students receive each day within their general education classrooms. It is High quality, research-based core instruction in the general education classroom. All students are given universal screening assessments to ensure that they are progressing and are learning essential skills. {Sidenote: A guaranteed and viable curriculum is one that guarantees equal opportunity for learning for all students. Similarly, it guarantees adequate time for teachers to teach content and for students to learn it. A guaranteed and viable curriculum is one that guarantees that the curriculum being taught is the curriculum being assessed. It is viable when adequate time is ensured to teach all determined essential content.}

Within Tier 1, all students receive high-quality, scientifically based instruction provided by qualified personnel to ensure that their difficulties are not due to inadequate instruction. All students are screened on a periodic basis to establish an academic and behavioral baseline and to identify struggling learners who need additional support. Students identified as being “at-risk” through universal screenings and/or results on state- or district-wide tests receive supplemental instruction during the school day in the regular classroom. The length of time for this step can vary, but it generally should not exceed 8 weeks. During that time, student progress is closely monitored using a validated screening system and documentation method.

Tier II: More intensive, targeted instruction, matched to student needs, is delivered to students who are not making adequate progress in Tier I; they often receive instruction in small groups. They receive progress monitoring weekly, and teachers regularly evaluate data to assess whether students are making progress or need different or more intense intervention.

Targeted Interventions are a part of Tier 2 for students not making adequate progress in the regular classroom in Tier 1 are provided with increasingly intensive instruction matched to their needs on the basis of levels of performance and rates of progress. Intensity varies across group size, frequency and duration of intervention, and level of training of the professionals providing instruction or intervention. These services and interventions are provided in small-group settings in addition to instruction in the general curriculum. In the early grades (kindergarten through 3rd grade), interventions are usually in the areas of reading and math. A longer period of time may be required for this tier, but it should generally not exceed a grading period. Tier II interventions serve approximately 15% of the student population. Students who continue to show too little progress at this level of intervention are then considered for more intensive interventions as part of Tier 3.

Tier III: The most intensive, individualized level of intervention. Students who have not responded to Tier II intervention receive daily, small group or one-on-one instruction. Students in this level often are already receiving special education services, or are referred for further evaluation for special education.

Here students receive individualized, intensive interventions that target the students’ skill deficits. Students who do not achieve the desired level of progress in response to these targeted interventions are then referred for a comprehensive evaluation and considered for eligibility for special education services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA 2004). The data collected during Tiers 1, 2, and 3 are included and used to make the eligibility decision. This is typically about 5% of your student population. 

So what does all of this mean???

What that means is this. A teacher or parent identifies a student’s needs, and they try some interventions. Sounds simple enough, right? 

So what’s the problem?

I have a family member who was struggling in reading. Mom talked to the teacher. The Teacher put the child in the RTI reading program. And she made progress and caught up with her peers. 

That is the main benefit of RTI. For the right kid, with the right intervention, that’s all they need. 

It can also look like a gifted student receiving enrichment in an area of strength like math. 

The downside to RTI, it can feel like the school or district is stalling to identify special education needs. Remember, students are general education students first. 

RTI is a general education progress. It's open to all students who fall below a benchmark. In Colorado, we look at iReady cut scores. Interventions need to be evidenced-based (which doesn’t always happen). This means teachers have to progress monitor students to ensure they are making progress within the selected intervention and if they are not bring them to the building RTI team. 

Every building works this process differently. In my building, we ask all teachers who have concerns about students to bring them to the RTI team. This ensures that teachers feel supported, the correct interventions are in place and should the student need to move forward with a special education evaluation the data the team needs is there. We also encourage parents to join the meetings. There is always a follow-up meeting scheduled 6 to 8 weeks out.

IDEA specifically addresses RTI and evaluations.

The 2004 reauthorization of IDEA makes mention of RTI as a method of part of the process of identifying SLD:

• In diagnosing learning disabilities, schools are no longer required to use the discrepancy model. The act states that “a local educational agency shall not be required to take into consideration whether a child has a severe discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability[…]”
• Response to intervention is specifically mentioned in the regulations in conjunction with the identification of a specific learning disability. IDEA 2004 states, “a local educational agency may use a process that determines if the child responds to scientific, research-based intervention as a part of the evaluation procedures.”
• Early Intervening Services (EIS) are prominently mentioned in IDEA for the first time. These services are directed at interventions for students prior to referral in an attempt to avoid inappropriate classification, which proponents claim an RTI model does. IDEA now authorizes the use of up to 15% of IDEA allocated funds for EIS.

So this is the part where I expect to get pushback. But RTI has been overused and abused. Used to delay Special Education Evaluations and Services. Often.

So much so that the OSEP has put out multiple guidance letters about this.

If your child is in RTI and is doing well, great! I mean it! I am always happy to see a child’s needs being met. However, just have it on your radar that RTI is sometimes used to delay evaluations or IEPs. The old “Let’s try RTI and ‘wait and see.‘ ” Go with your gut. If you believe your child needs an IEP, request IEP evaluations.

Bonus tip: Your child can be going through the IEP evaluation process and receive RTI interventions at the same time!

Parents, how do you know if their children are making progress?

An essential element of RTI is ongoing communication between teachers and parents. As parents, you are kept involved and informed of the process every step of the way, beginning with notification that your child has been identified as struggling in one or more areas and will receive more intensive intervention. If your child receives more targeted instruction in Tier II or Tier III, he or she will be progress monitored frequently. Teachers will share progress monitoring data with you regularly through meetings, phone calls, or emails, as well as progress reports sent home showing assessment data. 

When in doubt, ask the teacher for the data. 

This is one way the process can look. The big piece for RTI to work is having the process monitoring data so decisions can be made timely. 

My students love when they set short-term goals.  They love the thrill of the race. Of beating themselves. Of winning. These goals come from their IEP goals--broken down to a small chunk and most importantly student created. I also do six to eight weeks. It really depends on when our breaks are. This first one is 6 weeks and is rapidly coming to a close.

I started collecting the end of intervention data to review. I want to give you a closer look as to what I do and the decisions I make for the next intervention.



Step 1: Collate your data

If you remember, I get all the data for my interventions on a Google Sheet. (To catch how I set up this intervention click here) I start by going back to my original data and updating it with the new data.

As you can see, I added three new pieces of data, student's new baseline, the new gap, and the raw data change from the baseline.

In this case, I also color-coded the gap information. I did this to better see where the new gaps are and to see how well this intervention worked in closing those gaps.


Each student has their own graph. I also make sure I have up to date graph information.

Each graph has a trendline. By trendlines, I can see who over is activity closing their gaps faster than the goal line.

With these two pieces of data, I can make decisions about next steps.



Step 2: I've Got My Data--Now What

ALWAYS--Stick to FACT based statements, when talking about data. This helps me avoid student specific problems and opinions. (ie; they are slow, they are not working hard etc.)

*Students 1, 2, & 5 have gaps larger than 6.
*Students 1 & 2 had single-digit growth.
*Students 3, 4, 5, 6 had double-digit growth
*Everyone had growth.
*Average growth was 45 up from 32.




The Graphs:

*I look for trends: where is the score is (blue line) related to the trendline (pink line) and the Goal Line (yellow line).

I pay close attention to where these lines meet the Goal (red line). Is it before Week 19 or after?

*This matters, when determining if they are closing their gaps fast enough.

*Remember, the point is to move students more than a year. How long it may take them to close gaps is key to thinking about whether the intervention was successful for the student.


With this intervention, 3 students had great success, 2 students didn't, and 1 who it was moderately successful for.

Step 3: Analyze the Root Cause
(It takes at least five WHYs to get to a root cause) (You may find you need more information like a reading level, fluency data, etc. BUT stick to the FACTS.)




WHY: Student's need more encounters with sight words
WHY: Student's have the easy sight words but don't know what to do with the more difficult ones
WHY: Students are not connecting sight words from text to text
WHY: Sight word knowledge is not carrying over to Grade level Oral Reading Fluency
WHY: Students need more practice besides decodable repeated readings, individual flashcard rings, and instructional book reading.

Analysis:
*Keep intervention structure
*Change up: add extra practice to build the first 50 words
*Keep intervention cycle to 4 weeks
*Ensure Reading Mastery lessons are being completed with fidelity!

To Do over the next 4 weeks:
*Give all students a Phonics screener
*Complete an Error Analysis on Oral Reading Fluency

The why's are always hard but it helps you drill down to what needs to be changed. You also see--I have a list of things I need to do before the next cycle is over. These ideas fell out as I looked at the data--the big wondering "Is this a phonics thing?" Well, I don't have the right data to answer that question. If you find this to be your problem--then figure out your timeline to get the information you need and get it. But don't let it hold you up!! If you missed how I created this intervention you can check it out here.

Here is what the next four weeks of Sight Word Intervention:
*I will add an additional 4 weeks.
*I will add basic sight word books for the 3 students who made little growth.
*I will add exposure to more difficult sight words to all students based on the data from the grade level reading fluency.
*I will have a teammate come and observe a Reading Mastery lesson to ensure fidelity.

I hope you see how I work through my data at the end of an intervention and make changes to support students for the next four weeks. Send a shoutout on how your interventions are going and share any questions.

Chat Soon,

I have come to love John Hattie's work on student achievement. It makes creating small group interventions super easy and effective.  Its a resource a have come to use more and more as my budget gets smaller and helps me create something super specific to meet the needs of my ever-changing students with ease.

John Hattie has done the heavy lifting--researching some 200 influences on student achievement. The key is to look for ideas and not get caught up in the everything. You're looking for ideas that have been found to have the greatest effect size (the closer to 1 the better)


When I use Hattie to create interventions, I keep a couple of ideas in mind. I keep the ideas from Hattie to no more than 5, the intervention to 6 to 8 weeks, and very specific data collection.

Welcome to my Classroom

Here's a view of how I created an intervention to meet sight word and reading fluency goals.

Ideas from Hattie:

• Direct Instruction
• Feedback
• Repeated Reading
• Goals

These 4 influences play different roles in my intervention. Direct Instruction comes from SRA's Reading Mastery--this is the backbone of my instruction (bonus here is its research-based). Goals are set in two different ways-1) learning targets are a building requirement and 2) everyone set a SMART goal for sight words and reading fluency before the intervention started.

The nature of Reading Mastery is the immediate and actionable feedback is a lesson given but where does it come for sight words and reading fluency. For both, it is tied to repeated readings. After cold reads, students practice with an adult model before being timed each day.

Intervention:

This intervention is only set for six weeks. Why? It's long enough to make a couple of changes but short enough not to let half the year go by without seeing if its closing gaps.

Data Collection:

This intervention has four data points. Some data is collected daily and others once a week.

Sight word data is collected daily--as a repeated reading and as an exit ticket. The exit ticket words are reviewed weekly to see if students are progressing towards their goal.

Sight word data is also collected when they play games to see what carryover looks like.

Goal Line is IEP goal not the student set goal.

I also do trendlines more for me than my students. But having everything in graphs means I can look at it and see if they are moving up or if I need to change things up.



I also collect reading fluency data. The grade level data is graphed. The repeated reading data is kept in their binders as they collect it and maintain the data.  These goal lines make sense as they are working toward IEP goals.

I have all this data now what?

Reflect.

Reflect on the positives. Look at what needs to be changed.

Often you don't need to toss out the whole kitchen sink when putting the trashing the bin will work.

This intervention has at least 5 more weeks before it ends. Which gives me time to change things up if I need to.

Repeated Reading tell me if a student needs to spend more time with specific sight words. The same is true with the repeated readings they do with sight word heavy decodable text--if it needs to be more challenging.

Or if I need to look at an error analysis to see what changes need to be made to the overall intervention.

I'd love to hear how you set up your small group interventions. Where are your successes? Where do you need some help? I'd love to hear about your interventions.


Chat soon,